The Northern California Fly Fishing Board

Bjorn wrote:

2. Secret info... right...
People do ask me for sites on the McCloud and the Upper Sac... and I tell them. I don't buy into the whole "secret spot" thing for a moment. Fewer people are fishing now than 5 years ago and than 10 years ago. Sure, everyone shows up on the Trinity, but all that means is that some other water has fewer folks. There are people that buy into the secret idea. I don't. It is a philosophical difference.
What are you stupid or something? How you feel about secret info is irrelevant, how they feel about it is. Especially after you broke the rules, bad mouthed a guide and stole from them.

Bjorn wrote:

5. I actually didn't have my blog listed anywhere.... not my profile or signature. They found that in about 5 minutes though, posted it and the rest is history.
Now that's a lie isn't it Bjorn? You posted a link to your blog somewhere, that's what started everything. Spam is against the rules over there, that's what all the stuff about just jumping in and posting without getting a feel for the place was about. They were subtle but they tried to tell you. That's why they asked you if you were a friend of Nemo's(Nemo is the editor) or if you paid to advertise in the magazine. You were just too stupid to notice what they were telling you.

Bjorn wrote:

6. I posted a link to the thread about the Bahamas back on the Drake's site. I didn't take the thread and re-print it. The guy was pissed because the Drake post has pictures of his dad. He put the pictures of his dad on that site... a site that gets thousands and thousands of hits and then complained that I linked to it (his dad's pic wasn't on my site)... my site that gets very little traffic. That is just a mock complaint. That's just being angry to be angry. It is hollow and doesn't stand up to more than about a minute of critical thinking.
That's another lie isn't it Bjorn? I see that there are some changes to you blog since this happened. You've been busy mopping up after yourself haven't you?

Bjorn wrote:

To say I'm stealing anything is not true. You may think it is unethical to use published material that way, but that is your personal perspective, not a legal truth and not a perspective shared by all. Some people think split shot is unethical, some say jigs are.
Here we go again. It doesn't matter what you think is ethical or not. What matters is that they told you THEY didn't like it and that you didn't have permission to use their material without asking and you basicly told them to shove it. Face it, you made several mistakes and now you're lying your ass off to try and save face. Be a man and own it!

Sheeople wrote:
Bjorn wrote:

2. Secret info... right...
People do ask me for sites on the McCloud and the Upper Sac... and I tell them. I don't buy into the whole "secret spot" thing for a moment. Fewer people are fishing now than 5 years ago and than 10 years ago. Sure, everyone shows up on the Trinity, but all that means is that some other water has fewer folks. There are people that buy into the secret idea. I don't. It is a philosophical difference.
What are you stupid or something? How you feel about secret info is irrelevant, how they feel about it is. Especially after you broke the rules, bad mouthed a guide and stole from them.

Bjorn wrote:

5. I actually didn't have my blog listed anywhere.... not my profile or signature. They found that in about 5 minutes though, posted it and the rest is history.
Now that's a lie isn't it Bjorn? You posted a link to your blog somewhere, that's what started everything. Spam is against the rules over there, that's what all the stuff about just jumping in and posting without getting a feel for the place was about. They were subtle but they tried to tell you. That's why they asked you if you were a friend of Nemo's(Nemo is the editor) or if you paid to advertise in the magazine. You were just too stupid to notice what they were telling you.

Bjorn wrote:

6. I posted a link to the thread about the Bahamas back on the Drake's site. I didn't take the thread and re-print it. The guy was pissed because the Drake post has pictures of his dad. He put the pictures of his dad on that site... a site that gets thousands and thousands of hits and then complained that I linked to it (his dad's pic wasn't on my site)... my site that gets very little traffic. That is just a mock complaint. That's just being angry to be angry. It is hollow and doesn't stand up to more than about a minute of critical thinking.
That's another lie isn't it Bjorn? I see that there are some changes to you blog since this happened. You've been busy mopping up after yourself haven't you?

Bjorn wrote:

To say I'm stealing anything is not true. You may think it is unethical to use published material that way, but that is your personal perspective, not a legal truth and not a perspective shared by all. Some people think split shot is unethical, some say jigs are.
Here we go again. It doesn't matter what you think is ethical or not. What matters is that they told you THEY didn't like it and that you didn't have permission to use their material without asking and you basicly told them to shove it. Face it, you made several mistakes and now you're lying your ass off to try and save face. Be a man and own it!





I am getting sick and tired of you dickheads that come on here and lurk and create a fake profile so that they can bash somebody in anonimity. Especially when it is about something that happened on another fishing board or to bitch about how bad this board has become. I have an Idea for you quit yur bitchin and start contributing to this board or delete your fake profile and stfu . I am done with my rant. Theres steelhead in the river a hundred yards away to catch.