|
Andrew Weiner wrote:
... CT was undoubtedly well intentioned in NFF FERC negotiations, but clearly the river has been affected adversely....
You're joking, right? How about "they didn't give a flying one about a river that doesn't pop up every month on some ff
magazine". And yes, the river has been clearly affected adversely, exactly like everybody told them months before they even signed. But hey... we were just a bunch of Oroville white trash meth adicts. How can we even think to argue with the "San Francisco biologists"? Who cares? Now it's just a beaten dead horse... did you see those last Simms boots with the built in deodorant?
For me... I hope they throw the mother of all the floods down the McCloud, the Pitt, the Upper Sac and the Trinity and then turn CT into a strip bar.
|
Favoured: 0
