|
Sorry, I stand by what I said. Anyone with knowledge about farming in the Central Valley, particularly that of Boswell's company, knows that there have been many prices to pay for the success of that company. Environmentally and socially. It's the nature of this country for some to find all positives in what Boswell has done, and others to view things differently. I didn't say anything about the man personally. My post concerned the environmental impact on the state of California from the practices of his company. I don't know if you've read King of California, but I recommend it.
Just because companies employ people doesn't mean they are above examination. If you hold banks and lending companies responsible for the impact their practices have had on the economy, despite the fact that they employ probably millions of people, isn't it also appropriate to direct a critical eye at the impact another company has on the environment, also despite employing many people?
|
Favoured: 0
