|
man... it just never stops, eh? Is FOR's work to try and get Wild & Scenic status for the Little Sur or the Arroyo Seco and several other Central California rivers/creeks a rafting issue?
Is our work to get the dams off the Klamath a rafting issue? Wouldn't the removal of those dams actaully remove white water flows on the Upper Klamath?
What part of our work to oppose Sites Reservoir or the Temperance Flat Dam would classify as advocating rafting?
Is our work to get the National Recreation Area on the Lower Sacramento near Red Bluff a rafting issue?
Is our work to revoke the water rights for the proposed Auburn Dam a rafting issue? How about our work to improve the spillway at Folsom Reservoir or improve/strengthen the levees downstream of Folsom?
Who, on the FOR Conservation Staff (Ron, Steve, Kelly) is working on rafting or whitewater issues?
I can't wait to hear. See, I work at FOR and I know that we are not working on ANY rafting issues in the State. We wouldn't begin to have the staff, time or money to work on rafting issues if we wanted to... and we don't. We work on rivers. We work on places that offer us the opportunities to use the tools available... Wild & Scenic legislation and Dam Relicensing and other levers.
It's just getting silly, man. You are not helping anything, anyone or any place with this.
B-
|
Favoured: 0
