NCFFB
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Not that far, but distance isn't everything... (1 viewing) (1) Guest
Interested in getting more exposure? Write an article!
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Not that far, but distance isn't everything...
#7829
Arizona Bruce (User)
Platinum Poster!
Posts: 651
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Rod Review: Loomis Eastfork 3 wt. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
You may (or may not) remember a question I posed a few weeks ago about purchasing a 3 wt. to fish in the alpine lakes and streams of Wyoming.

I received the ire of a few when I mentioned wanting a fast rod with a little extra backbone to target large out-of-reach trout in possibly windy conditions and also wanting to fish dries on small streams.

I've already got a softer Orvis 3 wt. that will serve as my second rod.

I settled on a G. Loomis 8'6" Eastfork, a new model. I've enjoyed Loomis rods, along with Sages and Winstons in the past.

I took the Eastfork to the city park this morning (the only place in town with green grass, excluding the golf course and high school football field) and practiced casting with a 3 wt and 4 wt rod. Sweeeeeeeeet!

There was a light breeze and the 3 wt. line didn't load well, but I did manage a 56 foot cast, which is far for me.

The 4 wt. line was terrific. The rod loaded well and with little effort I zipped by the 60 foot mark by almost 10 feet.

I certainly won't need that distance on the streams, but the lakes might be another story. And, the rod is SO light!

Later, I compared the Loomis to my favorite 4 wt., a medium fast Winston Ibis. I figured if the Loomis loaded with a 4 wt. line, then maybe it was actually similar to the Winston.

The Loomis is so much lighter! It's not as soft and is much thinner in the butt. I think it'll be a real kick to play a 20"+ fish with it.

The only thing left is to see how well it handles dries.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
A steelhead fly fisherman needs two qualities:
A strong casting arm and a room temperature IQ.
--Thomas McGuane--
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7832
Phil (Admin)
Admin
Posts: 1029
graph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Rod Review: Loomis Eastfork 3 wt. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
Bruce,

I'm shocked you would admit to only casting 56 feet with a three weight. I heard that real steelheaders cast at least 110 feet!
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
I am haunted by waters.
Norman MacLean
A River Runs Through It
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7836
Arizona Bruce (User)
Platinum Poster!
Posts: 651
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Phil... 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
someday the spey will lose it's mystery to me, but right now I'm as good at two-handed casting as I am at differential equations...or at keeping my mouth shut
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
A steelhead fly fisherman needs two qualities:
A strong casting arm and a room temperature IQ.
--Thomas McGuane--
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7839
troutnut (User)
Gold Poster
Posts: 294
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Rod Review: Loomis Eastfork 3 wt. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
If he got a Helios it would have MAGICALLY made him cast 110 feet.

What I want to know is, how far can he cast that 3wt with a softball sized bobicator and jig?
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7844
Arizona Bruce (User)
Platinum Poster!
Posts: 651
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Not that far, but distance isn't everything... 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
and using a 3 wt with a big bobicator is like using a frying pan to put a nail in a 2 X 4
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
A steelhead fly fisherman needs two qualities:
A strong casting arm and a room temperature IQ.
--Thomas McGuane--
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7860
Buzz (Admin)
Admin
Posts: 918
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Rod Review: Loomis Eastfork 3 wt. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
Bruce,

Glad to hear that you settled on a rod. Sounds like a FAST one. That will work well in the Winds, as most of your fishing will be on lakes.


Buzz
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
Our tradition is that of the first man who sneaked away to the creek
when the tribe did not really need fish.
~Roderick Haig-Brown
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7861
Arizona Bruce (User)
Platinum Poster!
Posts: 651
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Rod Review: Loomis Eastfork 3 wt. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
Thanks Buzz,

I'm also curious to see how it will do with dries and indicators and buggers on the San Juan. (97% of the fishermen on the Juan use indicators when they're not casting dry fliew, but streamers WILL work there.)

My impression is that even though fast, it's still just a 3 wt., so it's still light and will baby a thin tippet.

As to whether or not I can delicately place a dry with it rather than plop it like a blockbuster bomb, that still remains to be seen.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2008/04/15 13:58 By Arizona Bruce. Reason: Accuracy
 
A steelhead fly fisherman needs two qualities:
A strong casting arm and a room temperature IQ.
--Thomas McGuane--
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7863
Buzz (Admin)
Admin
Posts: 918
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Rod Review: Loomis Eastfork 3 wt. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
If you wanted to delicately place a dry, you should have bought a fiberglass or bamboo rod!
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
Our tradition is that of the first man who sneaked away to the creek
when the tribe did not really need fish.
~Roderick Haig-Brown
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7868
pgw (User)
Platinum Poster!
Posts: 465
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Rod Review: Loomis Eastfork 3 wt. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
Good observation Buzz,
Although both fiberglass and cane are generally heavier than newer graphite rods, it's because they are more limber (or slower) that allows not only for delicacy but also for their ability to protect light tippets...but then, perhaps ham-fisted neophites can't be expected to understand the physical relationships that exist within the various objects and materials which exist between the fisherman's hand and a fish's jaw.

Paul
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
"Outside a dog a book is man's best friend...and inside a dog, it is too dark to read!" G. Marx
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7869
Charlie S (User)
Platinum Poster!
Posts: 560
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Rod Review: Loomis Eastfork 3 wt. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
So, bottom line, you're happy with your new 4wt rod. Good for you, that's all that counts.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7874
Arizona Bruce (User)
Platinum Poster!
Posts: 651
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Well, so far... 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
Since it's a new model, I'll give a thumbs up or down after it's truely tested, and maybe that info will be put to good use by other posters.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
A steelhead fly fisherman needs two qualities:
A strong casting arm and a room temperature IQ.
--Thomas McGuane--
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
#7882
Buzz (Admin)
Admin
Posts: 918
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:Rod Review: Loomis Eastfork 3 wt. 17 Years, 6 Months ago  
Well, Paul, as you know, the S-glass (12 million modulus) rods are amazingly light compared to the standard E-glass. My go-to Sierra stream rod is a Winston 3-weight (rolled by Fisher) made with S-glass circa 1985. It is a truly awesome fishing tool.

While there are a few mainline manufacturers still making fiberglass rods and blanks (Lamiglas comes to mind), the really excellent blanks and rods are being made by Mark Steffen (Steffen Brothers Fly Rods) and Mike McFarland McFarland Rod Company.

Of course, all that is not to say that other old rods are not fishable. I have a nice 7' 7wt Silaflex rod (pre-Browning) that is a lot of fun to fish, even though it weighs a bit more than a modern blank. And the Fenwick Feralites are excellent rods too.

I prefer the pace of fishing with these rods. You just can't rush your cast or you get into trouble. This, in turn, provides a much more relaxed day on the water, with a completely different appreciation of even the smallest trout. There is nothing quite like sneaking on hands and knees up to a slow-moving section of water, gently laying a cast on the pool in a way that does not send the fish skittering for cover, and tempting a trout to slowly rise up to take your offering. This is the angler's art in it's truest form, and very hard to accomplish with a telephone pole.

Buzz
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
 
Last Edit: 2008/04/16 07:59 By Buzz.
 
Our tradition is that of the first man who sneaked away to the creek
when the tribe did not really need fish.
~Roderick Haig-Brown
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
Go to top Post Reply

Template Chooser

Template : Numinu | Dorona Brown | Default
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop
© 2007 The Northern California Fly Fishing Board (NCFFB)
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack Joomla Templates by Compass Design