NCFFB
Welcome, Guest
Please Login or Register.    Lost Password?
Re:But, for a buck, wasn't that. . . (1 viewing) (1) Guest
Interested in getting more exposure? Write an article!
Go to bottom Post Reply Favoured: 0
TOPIC: Re:But, for a buck, wasn't that. . .
#5566
troutnut (User)
Gold Poster
Posts: 294
graphgraph
User Offline Click here to see the profile of this user
Re:But, for a buck, wasn't that. . . 18 Years, 1 Month ago  
They were 8 oz cups of Bud, so yes, you could call it recycled. Today the same cup was $5.
 
Report to moderator   Logged Logged  
  The administrator has disabled public write access.
  thread link
 ISE Sacramento  - Jet  01/14/08 11:17 am
    thread link
thread linkthread link  Re:ISE Sacramento  - troutnut  01/18/08 8:32 am
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread link  Re:ISE Sacramento  - pgw  01/18/08 10:03 am
    thread link
thread linkthread link  Re:ISE Sacramento  - Jeffery Trout  01/18/08 10:51 am
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread link  Re:ISE Sacramento  - troutnut  01/18/08 12:22 pm
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread linkthread link  But, for a buck, wasn't that. . .  - gitt  01/18/08 8:07 pm
    thread link
thread linkthread linkthread linkthread linkthread link  Re:But, for a buck, wasn't that. . .  - troutnut  01/18/08 10:28 pm
Go to top Post Reply

Template Chooser

Template : Numinu | Dorona Brown | Default
Powered by FireBoardget the latest posts directly to your desktop
© 2007 The Northern California Fly Fishing Board (NCFFB)
Joomla Templates by JoomlaShack Joomla Templates by Compass Design