|
There is a big jump from "bigger cages for chickens" to "nail in the coffin for hunting and fishing." Every side does the "slippery slope" argument, but it's kind of hard to see the slope on this one... I can't see the logical progression from changing ag practices to "you can't hunt or fish."
I'm going to vote against it, for other reasons, but I still don't see the tie to hunting or fishing.
Hunters and fisherman are harmed a lot more by Playstations than legislation. Kids don't get out and fish or hunt as much as they used to. We are more disconnected from the natural world. If you aren't in nature, you don't undersand it, don't value it... and if you don't understand the nature of the problem, you can't understand the solution... or something along those lines.
|
Favoured: 0
